Translated from volumes published by Lorenz Jung based on the edition “Gesammelte Werke” dtv.de The Symbols of Transformation (1952) and Aion (1950)
With warm regards, I would like to share another section of Jung’s concept of the Mana-Personality (The past sections: here, here, here and here). In this part, he discusses a sequence of dreams and, in the case of neurotics, a series of fantasies and how these are concealed in our subconscious and brought to light through dreams. Another topic is the complex, which also was a crucial subject for Sigmund Freud. The complex is a natural component of everyone’s inner self that accumulates from childhood to adulthood, which nobody can avoid. We should strive to explore our inner selves to untangle their knots- this contributes to the effort of comprehending the unconscious and bringing it into consciousness.
I firmly believe Dr. Jung holds the key to the recovery and healing process for every individual and, consequently, our entire society. His effort to identify and explain the main problems, which are timeless and universal, is truly commendable and offers valuable lessons for us all.

That is why I stop after establishing the fact that in the Occident, this archetype, or this “God-image,” is seen in Christ, in the Orient, in the Buddha, or in the form of Tao (which is not a personification but a metaphysical hypostasis).
In these three concrete forms, the archetype of the self appears to us.
Since it represents the centre of All, it can be called the vas mysticum, filled with the Spiritus Sancta servitor mundi.
Carl Jung Depth Psychology
Letters of C. G. Jung: Volume 2, 1951-1961
The title image: Gianluca “Tenia” Gambino: The Voice of Redemption
Individuation
The Mana Personality (P5)
Since it is impossible for me to present the reader with such a series of images, some of which are very long, in detail, I would ask them to be content with the few examples and otherwise to trust my assertion that these are logically constructed, goal-oriented connections. I use the word “goal-oriented” with a certain hesitation, however. This word should be used with caution and with restrictions. In the case of mentally ill people, one can observe a series of dreams and, in the case of neurotics, a series of fantasies that run almost aimlessly within themselves. The young patient whose suicidal fantasy I mentioned above (The mentioned dream about his bride from the last post) is well on the way to producing a series of aimless fantasies if he does not learn to take an active part and consciously intervene. Only in this way can a direction be achieved towards a goal. The unconscious is a purely natural process, on the one hand, without intention but on the other hand, with every potential direction characteristic of every energetic process. But if the conscious mind actively experiences each stage of the process and at least understands it vaguely, the following image begins at the higher level achieved as a result, and this is how direction is created.
The next goal of dealing with the unconscious is to reach a state in which the unconscious contents no longer remain unconscious and no longer express themselves indirectly as anima and animus phenomena, i.e. a state in which the anima (and the animus) become a function of the relationship to the unconscious. As long as they are not this, they are autonomous complexes, that is, disruptive factors that break through the control of consciousness and thus behave like real troublemakers. Because this is such a well-known fact, my term ‘complex’ has also become common in everyday language. The more ‘complex’ someone has, the more obsessed he is, and if one tries to create a picture of the personality that expresses itself through his ‘complexes’, you may come to the conclusion that it must be a hysterical femininity – hence anima! But if he now becomes conscious of his unconscious contents, not as factual contents of his personal unconscious, but as fantasies of the collective unconscious, he gets to the roots of his complexes and thereby triggers his obsession. The anima phenomenon then ceases.
But that certain overpowering force that caused the obsession – what I cannot shake off must be superior to me in some way – should logically disappear with the anima; one should become >complex-free<, psychologically house-trained, so to speak. Nothing should happen that the “I” does not allow, and if the “I” wants something, nothing should be able to interfere. This would secure the “I”, an unassailable position, the steadfastness of a superman or the superiority of a perfect sage. Both figures are ideal images, Napoleon on the one hand and Lao Tzu on the other. Both figures correspond to the ‘extraordinarily effective’ concept, which is the term Lehmann uses in his well-known monograph to explain Mana (Lehmann: Mana, 1922). Therefore, I simply call such a personality a Mana Personality. It corresponds to a dominant of the collective unconscious, an archetype that has developed in the human psyche since time immemorial through appropriate experience. The primitive man does not analyse or explain why another is superior to him. If he is smarter and stronger than him, he has Mana; that is, he has greater power; he can also lose this power, perhaps because someone has stepped over him in his sleep or someone has stepped on his shadow.
To be continued! 🙏💖



















































You must be logged in to post a comment.