Politics: a Dirty Game… Just as Always!

Standard

I believe in them more than they believe in themselves.
Franz Kafka

I stayed silent throughout these days, despite the pain in my heart. With my wet, excited eyes, I observed the events in Iran. I saw large crowds of young people, both girls and boys, demonstrating courageously and risking their lives—more than during the last forty years of uprisings—fighting against the Mullahs’ regime tyranny for freedom. But what a dream! As I heartbreakingly knew, the influential figures behind the scenes never allowed a free Iranian state to emerge, and they employ the same tactics as they did with the 1953 coup against the Mossadegh government.

From the beginning of the Mullah regime’s rule, I realised it was simply another Western invention. It appeared different: instead of backing America, it called for its death, but ultimately, the result was the same- control was maintained! And unfortunately, I see the West, with their puppet loudmouth as the front, trying to install another puppet in power in Iran to keep control and reap benefits.

That’s unfortunate: so much bloodshed without any reward! Willy Brandt, the former German Chancellor, once asked: ‘Must one practise democracy, or should one dare to embrace it?’ The real question is: practising for how long and at what cost? Certainly, friends and activists outside Iran may disagree or be hesitant to agree with my perspective. I understand that my view is blunt and unsettling, but the truth is undeniably tough to face.

I didn’t want to dwell on these disappointing events, but when my dear friend Resa asked how I felt, I decided to write a few words, and I leave it to you to judge the role of the great politicians in power. Also, I don’t want to share many photos or videos as they can deeply affect anyone who watches them. 🙏

Are you now riding the Chariots of the Gods to Return to the Stars? Erich von Däniken; A Tribute!

Standard

Erich von Däniken: The Ancient Astronaut Theorist

Erich von Däniken (born 14 April 1935 in Zofingen, Switzerland; died 10 January 2026) became one of the most controversial and successful writers of the 20th century. He gained worldwide recognition with his 1968 bestseller “Chariots of the Gods?”—a book that offered a radical reinterpretation of ancient history and archaeology. Däniken’s main thesis is that ancient extraterrestrial visitors contacted early civilisations, which explains structures such as the Egyptian pyramids, the Nazca Lines, and the Easter Island heads as either built using alien technology or as tributes to alien visitors. He proposes that gods described in religious texts are actually misinterpreted encounters with highly advanced extraterrestrials.

Von Däniken’s work has had a notable yet controversial impact. “Chariots of the Gods?” sold millions worldwide and sparked an entire genre of “ancient astronaut” literature and media. His ideas have captivated the public and influenced pop culture, from documentaries to science fiction. However, his theories are largely rejected by the scientific and archaeological communities. Critics point out that he often misuses archaeological data, ignores conventional explanations for ancient accomplishments, and underestimates the skills of ancient civilisations. Scholars argue that his theories rely on selective evidence, logical errors, and a basic misunderstanding of scholarly methods. Many also note that his ideas subtly undermine the achievements of ancient peoples, particularly non-European cultures.

Despite facing extensive academic criticism, von Däniken continues to be a cultural icon. His work raises lasting questions about our interpretation of history and highlights humanity’s fascination with extraterrestrial life. Whether regarded as a visionary challenging conventional views or accused of pseudoscience, Erich von Däniken has undeniably influenced popular culture and public discussions about ancient mysteries.

Al and I first encountered him, or rather his books, in the early seventies. In Iran, as I may have mentioned earlier, it is possible to find any book translated into Persian, even though the readership is limited; publishers endeavour to publish as many as they can.

We were genuinely intrigued and, as expected, valued his opinions on the space gods. Years later, in Bern, Switzerland, we met him in person at a three-day conference on Aliens, Abductions, and the eyewitnesses of those events. Interestingly, he was delighted to meet two brothers from Iran who spoke German, and they managed to recount their encounters with extraterrestrials.

In the spring of 2016, my lovely wife bought some surprise tickets for us to drive to Menden, a town not too far away, to meet the archaeologists and mythologists she knew I was connected with on Facebook and was fascinated by their work, like Robert Bauval, David Roll, Graham Hancock, Brien Foerster… and, of course, Erich von Däniken. There, I met him again, though alone because Al had already passed between the stars. I tried to introduce myself when I saw him, but astonishingly, he recognised me immediately and asked about Al, my brother! That was my last encounter with him, and I cherish having known him so well.

“Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, and the wheels would rise along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels. When the creatures moved, they also moved; when the creatures stood still, they also stood still; and when the creatures rose from the ground, the wheels rose along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.” Ezekiel 1:20-21

One of his most recognised theories relates to the prophet Ezekiel. Erich von Däniken’s Ezekiel theory is a well-known example of his “ancient astronaut” hypothesis. Von Däniken interpreted Ezekiel’s vision of the Merkabah, or wheeled chariot, as a spacecraft used by an advanced civilisation to travel through space and establish contact, rather than as a divine vision.

In the Book of Ezekiel, the prophet describes seeing a wheeled chariot descending from the sky. Von Däniken noted that the original Hebrew text does not mention God; the term was added later. Ezekiel’s account of the landing of the wheeled chariot closely resembles a spacecraft, with the windstorm, lightning flashes, and bright lights reminiscent of a spaceship arriving.

Ezekiel describes a scene, ‘a wheel within a wheel’, with fiery lights and movement, depicting something coming from the north as a large cloud with “flashing lightning and brilliant light around it.’ The prophet also describes four “living creatures” with wings and complex faces, which are often interpreted as alien pilots or robotic beings accompanying the craft.

For von Däniken, Ezekiel’s biblical account of God’s appearance on Mount Sinai was nothing more than a spaceship landing. This interpretation appeared in his 1968 bestseller Chariots of the Gods?, which sold over 70 million copies worldwide.

In the 1970s, von Däniken’s theory influenced NASA scientist Josef F. Blumrich, who initially regarded Ezekiel’s vision as a space shuttle. This inspired Blumrich to write a book that sought to challenge von Däniken’s ideas, thereby creating a conflict with his own thesis.

Erich von Däniken passed away at age 90 on 11 January 2026 in a hospital in central Switzerland. With his death, the world has lost an unconventional and courageous theorist of ancient human mysteries.

My (Carl Jung’s) Most Difficult Experiment [p. 4]

Standard

I had a dream a few weeks ago, and surprisingly, I still remember it clearly. Usually, I forget my dreams the moment I wake up, but this one is vividly etched in my mind. In the dream, a bird flew elegantly through my room. She looked like a hummingbird, but much larger. She stared at me as she was facing the window. I suspected that I knew her well.

She gazed at me for a while before flying away; I don’t know where, but somehow she disappeared right before my eyes.

It reminded me of a dream Dr Jung once described. However, his bird was transformed into a child and could speak; mine did not, but I believed she was wise and knew many things.

Carl Jung’s dream of a white bird transforming into a girl, often a dove or gull, was a key vision from his Black Book. It signalled his break with Freud, marked his dive into deep psychological work, and symbolised the soul’s link to the spirit world, spiritual change, and the union of opposites within the Self. Featured in The Red Book, the dream showed birds as messengers of the soul, bridging conscious and unconscious, representing freedom, wisdom, and the’ higher self”.

I would now like to reiterate his dream, which I presented in the first part, because it is remarkable.

I dreamt at that time (it was shortly after Christmas 1912) that I was sitting with my children in a marvellous and richly furnished castle apartment – an open columned hall – we were seated at a round table, whose top was a marvellous dark green stone. Suddenly, a gull or a dove flew in and sprang lightly onto the table. I admonished the children to be quiet so they would not scare away the beautiful white bird. Suddenly, this bird turned into an eight-year-old blond child and ran around, playing with my children in the marvellous columned colonnades. Then, the child suddenly turned into the gull or dove. She said the following to me: “Only in the first hour of the night can I become human while the male dove is busy with the twelve dead.” With these words, the bird flew away, and I awoke. (Black Book 2, pp. 17-18)

Key Elements of Jung’s Bird Dream:
The White Bird: Symbolises the soul, spirit, or divine feminine (Anima), depicted as a dove or gull.
Transformation: The bird turning into an eight-year-old blond girl playing with his children represents the soul’s embodiment and interaction with earthly life.
The Message: “Only in the first hours of the night can I transform myself into a human being, while the male Dove is busy with the twelve dead” highlights the unconscious’s link to the spiritual realm and the soul’s hidden work.
Context: This dream from around 1912 helped Jung realise the collective unconscious archetypes and influenced his relationship with Toni Wolff.
Broader Jungian Bird Symbols:
Archetypal Connection: Birds link earthly and spiritual realms, symbolising transcendence, consciousness, and freedom.
The Self: Birds often symbolise the Self, representing wholeness and inner guidance.
Individuation: Birds symbolise Jung’s concept of individuation—integrating archetypes to achieve wholeness.
Language of Birds: In dreams, birds speak a symbolic language that reveals hidden meanings and psychic realities.

Jung’s bird dream was a profound encounter with his own unconscious, initiating his personal myth-making and laying the groundwork for his analytical psychology.

I know that one day, if I am still alive, I will continue this never-ending story, though there is another “never-ending story” in which I am fully involved! Enjoy your peaceful lives. ✌💕🥰

2026 Has Begun with Plenty of Activity!

Standard

Hello again, naturally!
I simply want to wish you all a joyful New Year filled with love and peace. I had intended to finish an article I began a few weeks ago, but right now I am fully occupied with the current events in Iran. This situation seems quite serious this time (hopefully!).
However, as I observe the events, the other parts of the world handle it very carefully, as I haven’t heard any news about it on German TV, until the “President of all time”, Trump, told the Mullah’s regime: Don’t kill people, otherwise I will get you!
That was like a green light for the global “Free Press?!” to discuss and highlight this event in their coverage. Even the late Shah’s prodigal son has spoken out (after remaining silent all this time) and thanked Trump for his threat.

So, this year seems promising; let’s hope for the best! Take care, stay healthy, and stay blessed.

The image at the top: a digital artwork titled Martha’s Buzz by Swedish illustrator Alexander Jansson.