god

The Seed is the Word of God, and the Ground is Our Hearts. (Bible; Verse 14 & Verse 15)

Standard
Charles K. Wilkinson Harvest Scenes, Tomb of Menna Twentieth Century; original New Kingdom The Metropolitan Museum of Art

And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. Genesis 1:29

Agathos Daimon, Osiris, Demeter, Neper, Abellio… All the gods have blessed human farming, but how old is our knowledge of agriculture?

Zagros-feature-Zagros Mountains history – Iran Nomad Tours

The Zagros Mountain range, located along the border between Iran and Iraq, was home to some of the world’s earliest farmers. Around 12,000 years ago, hunter-gatherer ancestors began experimenting with farming. Somewhere else, it says that Egyptians were among the first to practice agriculture on a large scale, starting in the pre-dynastic period from the end of the Paleolithic period into the Neolithic period, between around 10,000 BC and 4000 BC. This was made possible with the development of basin irrigation.

Neandertaler beim kochen!

However, this transition may have deeper historical roots. In “Neanderthals, Bandits, and Farmers,” author Tudge explains that agriculture was not abruptly invented 10,000 years ago; instead, it had already existed in a form he refers to as proto-farming or hobby farming for at least 30,000 years prior. This sheds light on the origins of the population explosion associated with the advent of agriculture.

The sequential art found on the walls of the tomb of Menna The Theban Tomb TT69

Let’s return to Egypt, where agriculture and harvesting have been essential practices since ancient times. Thanks to the unforgettable friend Marc Chartier and the dear and adorable Marie Grillot for presenting this excellent article.

Egypt: Harvesting information on harvests

via égyptophile

Tomb of Menna – photo Marie Grillot

In ancient Egypt, the harvest season (“chemo”) was a period of intense activity that kept agricultural workers busy for several weeks. When they were not enough for the task, mobile teams of reapers were added to them. Harvesting cereals began in Upper Egypt and progressed north to the Delta.

Administrative preambles marked the beginning of each harvest to check the equivalence between the result obtained and the forecasts: “When the ears of corn began to turn yellow,” writes Pierre Montet, “the peasant saw with apprehension the fields invaded by his natural enemies, his masters or the representatives of his masters, with a swarm of scribes, surveyors, employees and gendarmes who would first measure the fields. After that, the grains would be measured by the bushel, and one could get a very exact idea of ​​what the peasant would have to deliver, either to the agents of the treasury or to the administrators of a god such as Amon, who owned the best lands in the country.”

Tomb of Ounsou – photo The Louvre

The peasants used sickles with short handles and straight wooden blades in which flint teeth were embedded for their harvesting work. Later, this tool was replaced by a sickle with a curved metal blade. The harvester, leaning slightly forward, did not cut the stalks at ground level but as close as possible to the ears of corn, which he let fall to the ground. Women collected the ears of corn in baskets which, once complete, were carried to the end of the field, then from there, on the backs of donkeys or men, in large wicker baskets suspended from long sticks, were transported to the threshing floor.

The work had to be carried out quickly, often punctuated by the sound of a flute player. A supervisor was particularly attentive to the smooth running of operations, “watching over the grain.”

Tomb of Menna – photo Osirisnet.net

On the threshing floor, the harvested ears of corn were trampled to be threshed by oxen while the men used the flail to remove the grain and the pitchfork to separate the grain from the chaff. The final sequence was winnowing, often carried out by women, using hollowed-out ox hooves, curved pallets or wooden cups. The grain was finally stored in silos or warehouses, where scribes and controllers came to count the final product of the harvest. “The grains are cleaned,” Pierre Montet explains. “It is time for the scribes who come forward with everything they need to write and for the measurers who have taken their bushel. Woe to the peasant who has hidden part of his harvest or who, even in good faith, cannot give the lawyers everything that the field survey allows to be demanded. He is stretched out on the ground and beaten in rhythm, and worse misfortunes perhaps await him.”

The harvesters then had free rein to harvest for themselves, with the permission of the owners or managers, as much wheat or barley as they could gather in a day.

Looking back over the centuries, we note, from what Benoît de Maillet wrote in 1735 in his “Description of Egypt”, certain differences, but above all, a real continuity in peasant practices in the Nile Valley: “You would hardly forgive me if I forgot to tell you about harvest time and how it is done here. We regularly begin to work on the harvest at the end of April or in the first days of May. Then, we do not amuse ourselves by cutting the wheat, putting it in sheaves, and transporting it to places intended to preserve it for a long time in this way. The inhabitants of Egypt are more expeditious than all this. They begin by pulling up the grain and gathering it in the very middle of the fields in a space prepared to receive it. There, they gather it into a heap twenty to thirty feet in diameter, on which they first drive a few oxen to lower it. Then two oxen are yoked to a machine made in the form of a chair, furnished underneath with sharp stones, or eight or ten iron wheels threaded into a wooden axle. From this machine, a man seated there touches the oxen and makes several turns over this heap of barley or wheat until the wheels have cut the straw and separated the grain, which nevertheless remains with this chopped straw, which is kept for the cattle and serves as their oats. After this first method, the straw is separated from the grain and thrown lightly into the air with forks prepared for this purpose. Finally, there come sifters, who, with particular skill, separate the grain from the earth on the spot; after that, it is transported to granaries. This is how the harvest is carried out here, and this is all the trouble one has to collect the finest and best grain in the world.”

Photo Asma Waguth – Reuters

Two centuries later, the same observation: “[In Egypt], the wheat is cut with a primitive sickle; the ears are immediately tied into small sheaves, transported on camelback to the area where the grain will be threshed. This bare surface is usually set up near the fields. The sheaves are piled up there in large stacks.

The threshing machine, the ‘nôrag’, looks like a sledge. It is powered by oxen. Its wooden frame, on top of which sits the driver, supports solid iron wheels passed repeatedly over the wheat; they open the ears and separate the grain from the chaff. The detached stalks are collected, packed in net bags, and loaded onto donkeys’ backs. As for the grain, naturally mixed with straw, is piled up in heaps, ready to be winnowed. (…) Custom dictates that all harvesters are paid in kind. Lines of women and children can be seen returning from the fields carrying their wages on their heads. This custom goes back a long way and is observed to pay other people still.” (W.S. Blackman, Les fellahs de la Haute-Egypte, Payot, 1948)

It must be believed that in Egypt, perhaps more than elsewhere, agricultural practices and traditions span the centuries to the point of being almost timeless, even in their ritual side effects. In ancient Egypt, the beginning of the “chemo” season included the ceremony of the offering of the sheaf by the pharaoh: “presenting himself successively as protector and nourisher of Egypt” to the God Min, God of fertility, or other divinities such as Harsomtous.

Many centuries later, we read this account of another rite, certainly not directly linked to the pharaonic tradition, but no less important in popular “mythology”: “Before starting to cut the harvest, some villagers will pull out the most beautiful ears of corn by hand. They braid them according to a particular pattern, and the object thus formed, called the ‘bride of the grain’, ‘arûset el-qamh’, is used as a charm. One can hang one above the door of a house as a remedy against the evil eye; another will often take its place in the room containing the food provisions to ensure abundance.” (W.S. Blackman)

Sennedjem’s Tomb

Let us finally be guided to the Beyond of time, thanks to the symbolic richness of the tomb of Sennedjem (TT1) at Deir el-Medina in the fields of Ialou: “using a wooden sickle, the edge of which is encrusted with flint stones, Sennedjem, bent, cut the ears of corn very high. Thus, the straw will not be damaged by the trampling of the animals during threshing. Iyneferti (follows him) and collects the ears of corn, which she puts in a basket. We will notice in passing the size of the wheat stalks and the suggested immensity of the field that nothing limits. In the idyllic world of the Beyond, the harvests are always extraordinary.” (Osirisnet)

In these modern times, when Egypt is forced to buy wheat from foreign countries to meet the needs of its 90 million inhabitants, it is good to remember, as Benoît de Maillet wrote, that it produced “the most beautiful and best grain in the world.”

Marc Chartier

Sources :
Pierre Montet, Daily life in Egypt at the time of Ramses, Hachette, 1946 http://www.museum.agropolis.fr/pages/expos/egypte/fr/travaux/moisson.htm http://jfbradu.free.fr/egypte/SIXIEMES/agriculture/agriculture.html http://www.osirisnet.net/tombes/nobles/menna69/menna_02.htm

Published 11th May 2016 by Unknown

The Mystery Of “Mana Personality” Part Nine

Standard

Translated from volumes published by Lorenz Jung based on the edition “Gesammelte Werke” dtv.de The Symbols of Transformation (1952) and Aion (1950)

Today, I share the final part of the translation of Mana-Personality. It was full of joy for me to learn more and even better from his works because I had to read them word by word to achieve an understandable translation. I hope it was the same for you.

We often wonder why there are so many injustices, differences, and failures in human progress (decline?). Is God flawed? Dr. Jung suggests that God must be imperfect; otherwise, we cannot reach Him.

In the figure of the divine hero, God himself wrestles with his own imperfect, suffering, living creation; he even takes its suffering condition upon himself and, by this sacrificial act, accomplishes the opus magnum of salvation and victory over death.

Credit Text and Image Carl Jung Depth Psychology 🙏

He, instead, talks about the importance of the Self and Individuality.

He personally also admits that his explanation is sensitive to experiences that some may not have practised. He emphasizes:

I am deeply aware that in this work, I have not made any ordinary demands on the understanding of my reader. I have made every effort to smooth the path to understanding. Still, I have not been able to remove one great difficulty, namely the fact that the experiences underlying my explanations are probably unknown to most people and, therefore, strange...

Still, he tries to enlighten us on the matter based on his experiences.

Image credit Carl Jung Depth Psychology

Previous

Now, let’s move on to the final chords:

Individuation
The Mana Personality (P9)

The conception of God as an autonomous, psychological content makes God a moral problem – and that is, admittedly, very uncomfortable. But if this problem does not exist, then God is not real either because he does not intervene in our lives anywhere. Then, he is a historical conceptual bogeyman or a philosophical sentimentality.

If we leave the idea of ​​a “divine” out of the equation and speak only of autonomous contents, we may remain intellectually and empirically correct, but we thereby conceal a note that psychologically cannot be missed. If we use the idea of ​​a “divine”, we are thereby aptly expressing the peculiar way in which we experience the effects of autonomous content. We can also use the term “demonic” as long as we do not imply that we have reserved a concrete God somewhere who completely corresponds to our wishes and ideas. However, our intellectual sleight of hand tricks do not help us to create a being according to our wishes in reality, just as the world does not adapt to our expectations. If we, therefore, attribute the effects of autonomous contents with the attribute “divine”, we thereby acknowledge their relative superiority. And this superior is the power that has forced a man of all ages to think of the most unthinkable things and to inflict the greatest suffering on himself in order to do justice to those effects. This power is as real as hunger and fear of death.

The Self could be characterized as a kind of compensation for the conflict between inside and outside. This formulation may not be a lousy fit insofar as the Self has the character of something that is a result, an achieved goal, something that has only gradually come about and has become possible through much effort. Thus, the Self is also the goal of life, for it is the complete expression of the combination of destinies that we call the individual, and not just of the individual human being, but of a whole group in which one completes the other to form the complete picture.

With the sensation of the Self as something irrational, indefinable, to which the ego is not opposed and not subject, but rather attached and around which it rotates, as the earth rotates around the sun, the goal of individuation is achieved. I use the word “sensation” to describe the perceptual character of the relationship between “I” and Self. There is nothing recognizable in this respect because we are unable to say anything about the contents of the Self. The “I” is the only content of the Self that we know. The individualized “I” perceives itself as the object of an unknown and superior subject. It seems to me that the psychological statement reaches its extreme end here because the idea of ​​a Self is in and of itself a transcendent postulate that can be justified psychologically but cannot be proven scientifically. The step beyond science is an absolute requirement of the psychological development described here because, without this postulate, I could not adequately formulate the empirically occurring psychological processes. The Self, therefore, claims at least the value of a hypothesis corresponding to that of the atomic structure. And – should we still be enclosed in an image here – then it is something overwhelmingly alive, the interpretation of which is beyond my capabilities. I do not doubt that it is an image, but one in which we are still contained.

Youri Ivanov _ DIGITAL GRAPHIC ART _ SD World 141

I am deeply aware that in this work, I have not made any ordinary demands on the understanding of my reader. I have made every effort to smooth the path to understanding. Still, I have not been able to remove one great difficulty, namely the fact that the experiences underlying my explanations are probably unknown to most people and, therefore, strange. As a result, I cannot expect my readers to follow all of my conclusions. Although every author naturally enjoys understanding their audience, interpreting my observations is less important to me than pointing out a broad area of ​​experience that has hardly been explored, which I would like to make accessible to many through this book. In this area, which has been so obscure up to now, it seems to me that the answers are recumbent to many puzzles that the psychology of consciousness has never even come close to solving. I do not wish to claim under any circumstances to have formulated these answers definitively. I am, therefore, quite content if my paper can be regarded as a tentative attempt at an answer.

I sincerely appreciate your support and interest. Thank you!🤗🙏💖

The title image: Maiden Voyage of the Airship Falcon” by Alexei Gurl

The Mystery Of “Mana Personality” Part Eight

Standard

Translated from volumes published by Lorenz Jung based on the edition “Gesammelte Werke” dtv.de The Symbols of Transformation (1952) and Aion (1950)

via MagicShirtsDesigns

Greeting all! Today, I share the penultimate or the second to last episode of Dr. Jung’s extensive explanation of the mystery of Mana.
This time, he speaks in a way that may simplify the meaning of Mana and its production, with examples that we might confront every day of life (indeed!) concerning religions, society, and private occurrences!

We all know how important and influential religion is in human life. There have been and still are wars caused by religions (as it is more apparent when people from the same tribe with the same roots and similar faith cruelly kill each other)! However, religions may not be the main perpetrators. The problem may lie deep in the dark corners of human nature.

Mana-Personality is one of these unknown forces that we must understand.

My God is a child, so wonder not that the spirit of this time in me is incensed to mockery and scorn. There will be no one who will laugh at me as I laughed at myself. ~Carl Jung, Liber Novus, Page 234.

Illustration: thecyclopssun

You might remember that I actively assist my Iranian friends as they strive for freedom. However, I am feeling very pessimistic right now as I look at the situation and intricacy progression in the Middle East and see how the lobbyists in the West (i.e., the US, no matter if the next President will be Harris or Trump) are trying to take advantage of Iran’s future. Reading Jung helps me better understand the core of this issue and learn more.

I also learned something useful from my dear friend Luisa Zambrotta. (She has an excellent Website with many brilliant sequence stories you might not miss.) instead of numbering her stories one after another, she only uses the word “Previous” to help readers jump to the latest post if they want to. So I did it, too!🙏

The underlying scheme, the quaternio, i.e., the psychological equation of primordial dynamis (prima causa) with gods and their mythology, time and space, is a psychological problem of the first order.

via Carl Jung Depth Psychology

So, let’s continue to delve further into the topic of Mana!

Individuation
The Mana Personality (P8)

The Mana Personality is, on the one hand, a superior knower and, on the other hand, a superior wanter. By becoming aware of the content underlying this personality, we are able to deal with the fact that, on the one hand, we have learned something more than others and, on the other hand, we want something more than others. This unpleasant relationship with the gods is known to have struck poor Angelus Silesius so deeply that he returned headlong from his hyper-Protestantism, bypassing the now uncertain Lutheran stopover in the deepest womb of the black mother—unfortunately to the detriment of his lyrical talent and nervous health.

And yet Christ and, after him, Paul struggled with precisely these problems, which is still clearly evident from many traces. Meister Eckhart, Goethe in Faust, and Nietzsche in Zarathustra have brought this problem closer to us again. Goethe and Nietzsche try it with the idea of ​​control, the former with the magician and ruthless man of will who takes on the devil, the latter with the master race and the superior wise man, without the devil and without God. According to Nietzsche, man stands alone, like himself, neurotic, financially supported, without God or the world. This is not an ideal possibility for a real person who has a family and has to pay taxes. Nothing can prove the reality of the world away; there is no miraculous way around it. Nothing can also prove the effect of the unconscious away. Or can the neurotic philosopher prove to us that he does not have a neurosis? He cannot even prove it to himself. Therefore, our souls stand between significant influences from within and without, and somehow, we must do justice to both. We can only do this according to our individual abilities. Therefore, we must reflect on ourselves, not on “what one should” but on what one can and what one must do. Thus, the dissolution of the Mana Personality through awareness of its contents naturally leads us back to ourselves as beings and living something that is kept between two world views and their darkness. Still, all the more clearly, it clamped in the perceived forces. This ‘something’ is alien to us and yet so close, completely our own and yet unknowable to us, a virtual centre of such a mysterious constitution that it can demand everything, kinship with animals and with gods, with crystals and stars, without surprising us, without even arousing our deformity. This something demands all of that, and we have nothing in our hands that we can reasonably oppose this demand, and it is even healing to hear this voice.

Art by Jeramondo Djeriandi (@djeriandi)

I have called this centre the Self. Intellectually, the Self is nothing but a psychological concept, a construct intended to express an entity that is unknowable to us and that we cannot grasp as such, for it is beyond our comprehension, as is clear from its definition. It might just as well be called the “God within us.” The beginnings of our whole psychic life seem to spring inextricably from this point, and all the highest and final goals seem to converge towards it. This paradox is inevitable, as it always is when we attempt to characterize something that lies beyond the power of our understanding.

I hope that it has become clear enough to the attentive reader that the Self has as much to do with the “I” as the sun has to do with the Earth. The two cannot be mixed up. Nor is it a question of the deification of man or the degradation of God. What lies beyond our human understanding is, in any case, inaccessible to it. When we use the concept of a god, we are simply formulating a certain psychological fact, namely the independence and superiority of specific psychic contents, which is expressed in their ability to thwart the will, to obsess (calm) the consciousness and to influence moods and actions. One might be outraged that an inexplicable mood, a nervous disorder or even an uncontrollable vice is in some way a manifestation of God. But it would be an irreplaceable loss for religious experience if such things, even terrible things, were artificially separated from the number of autonomous psychic contents. It is an apotropaic euphemism (a good thing for a bad thing, to avert its disfavour) to dismiss such things with a “nothing but” explanation. This would only repress them and, as a rule, would only result in a false advantage, a slightly modified illusion. The personality does not become enriched by this but rather impoverishes and becomes stagnant. What appears to be evil or at least senseless and worthless to today’s experience and knowledge can appear to be a source of the best to a higher level of expertise and knowledge, whereby everything naturally depends on the use one makes of one’s devils. Declaring it meaningless requires the personality of the shadow corresponding to it, and thus, it loses its form. The ‘living figure’ needs deep shadows to appear three-dimensional. Without the shadow, it remains a flat illusion of- or a more or less well-behaved child.

With this, I am alluding to a problem that is far more significant than the few simple words seem to express: Humanity is, for the most part, still psychologically in a state of childhood – a stage that cannot be skipped. The vast majority need authority, guidance and the law. This fact must not be overlooked. The Paulistic overcoming of the law is only possible for those who know how to put the soul in place of conscience. Very few are capable of this (>Many are called, but few are chosen.<), and these few only take this path out of inner compulsion, not to say necessity, for this path is as narrow as the edge of a knife.

To be continued! 🤗🙏💖

The Supreme Meaning!

Standard

Liber Primusfol.i(v) p. 120, Reader’s Edition

I am getting older (does not everybody do this?!), though I feel this ageing more and more as I’m heading towards my seventieth of that day in which I’ve opened my eyes to the sun. That’s why one may contemplate deeply about religion and the purpose of life, striving to understand and grasp the concept of God, as I am daring to do today.

When I became acquainted with C.G. Jung, I realized that I had found a guide who could help me think more clearly to find answers to my questions. I don’t know about you, but I believe that when ageing, one feels more solitude and begins to enjoy it. However, it’s important to note that he is not a saviour but rather a teacher who can point the way and offer valuable insights through his writings, particularly in his Red Book.

For me, the Red Book by Carl Jung is like the holy book. I may say it is like the Bible for a Christian, or the Koran for a Muslim, and the same as the Torah for a Jew, etc. The difference between them is that Dr Jung never tries to make statements of one particular God as their messenger but tries to define how a god can be definite! Here comes the concept: Supreme Meaning! The melting of sense and nonsense. And I think that this aspect needs a broad view.

The supreme meaning is great and small; it is as wide as the space of the starry Heaven and as narrow as the cell of the living body. C.G. Jung, The Red Book: Liber Novus.

I present you a small part, a page, of his words of knowledge on this concept. I hope it opens one or more doors in your life as it did for mine.

Portrait by Olga KURKINA

The spirit of the depths took my understanding and all my knowledge and placed them at the service of the inexplicable and the paradoxical. He rubbed me of speech and wrote me for everything that was not in his service, namely the melting together of sense and nonsense, which produces the supreme meaning.
But the supreme meaning is the path, the way and the bridge to what is to come. That is the God yet to come. It is not the coming God himself, but his image which appears in the supreme meaning. (1)

God is an image, and those who worship him must worship him in the image of the supreme meaning. The supreme meaning is not a meaning and not an absurdity; it is image and force in one, magnificence and force together.

The supreme meaning is the beginning and the end. It is the bridge of going across and fulfilment. (2)

The other Gods died of their temporality, yet the supreme meaning never dies; it turns into meaning and then into absurdity, and out of the fire and blood of their collision, the supreme meaning rises up rejuvenated anew.

The image of God has a shadow. The supreme meaning is real and casts a shadow. For what can be actually corporeal and have no shadow?

The shadow is nonsense. It lacks force and has no continued existence through itself. But nonsense is the inseparable and undying brother of the supreme meaning.

Like plants, so men also grow, some in the light, others in the shadows. There are many who need the shadows and not the light.

The image of God throws a shadow that is just as great as itself.

The supreme meaning is great and small; it is as wide as the space of starry Heaven and as narrow as the cell of the living body.

1- In Transformations and Symbol of the Libido (1912), Jung interpreted God as a symbol of the libido (CW B, §111). In this subsequent work, Jund laid great emphasis on the distinction between the God image and the metaphysical existence of God (cf. passages added to the revised retitled 1952 edition, Symbols of Transformation, CW 5, § 95)

2- The terms Hinübergehen (going across, passing over), Übergang (transition), Untergang (down-going, downfall), and Brücke (bridge) feature in Nietzsche’s Zarathustra in relation to the passage from man to the Übermensch (superman). For example, “What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal; what can be loved in man is that he is a “going-across” and a “downfall”. //I love those who do not know how to live except their lives be a “downfall”, for they are those who are going over”(tr. R. Hollingdale [Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984], p. 44, tr. mod; words are asunderlined in Jung’s copy).

Top image by Ettore Aldo Del Vigo

Thank you for your support. 💖🙏🌹